Can you come up with a title?!

Story #1: 

You are going out of town and you need someone to take care of your cow Betsy.  You give her over to the neighbor, John, and ask him to take good care of her.  You tell John the feeding times and to shower Betsy with lots of love.  You give John a 100$ for his services.

Two weeks later you come back home and John tells you, "I have got some sad news to share with you, Betsy was stolen."  Grieved at the turn of events and the loss of your cow, you tell John, "You were a paid guardian and you are liable for a stolen object, pay up!" John concedes and pays you the money. 

A week later the police find good old Betsy in the hands of Ivan the Thief.  Unfortunately Betsy is no longer alive, Ivan slaughtered Betsy :-(, boo hoo.  The courts obligate Ivan to pay four times Betsies' value (as the law mandates for a thief) to John, your neighbor. 

Johns' payment to you for Betsy, has given him the rights to any future income resulting from Betsy. In this case the income is rather high. Four times her value.  Ouch. Tough Nuggets! 

Story #2:

You are downsizing.  You are throwing stuff out that you dont need.  You have a bunch of pots and pans that you dont need but dont want to throw out.  You bring them over to the local "Store and Lock LTD".  The storage fee is 40$ a year, you pull out your wallet and pay two years in advance.  Great price.

Its time for the Bar Mitzvah of your eldest son. Mazel Tov! You decide you are going to self cater.  Nothing tastes as good as home made grub.  Now is when those pots and pans will come in handy.  You go over to the "Store and Lock LTD", and much to your chagrin they tell you there has recently been a robbery and amongst the stolen items are your pots and pans.  In an attempt to placate you they give you back the full value of a new set of pots and pans, you are elated. 

Two weeks later you see in the newspaper that the thief was found, taken to court and found guilty and penalized with paying "Store and Lock LTD" double the value of the pots and pans.  Aww shucks. 

Why to them? Same reason as above.  Store and Lock LTDs' payment to you for the pots and pans, has given them the rights to any future income resulting from the pots and pans. In this case the income was double their value. Not as bad as the cow, but that is a 100% return.

Laws learnt: A paid guard who pays for the stolen object assumes all future income from the stolen object.  The item effectively comes into the possession of the guardian.  In the event the thief is found, all proceeds go to the paid guard.  For anything that was stolen the guard gets double the value in return, with the exception of an ox or lamb when slaughtered he gets four or five times the value in return.  Those are the penalties placed on the thief.  A regular object = 2 * value. Slaughtered ox = 4 * value.

When two cases or stories are brought in a Mishna, the Gemoro frequently questions the necessity to bring both cases down. 

Here the Gemoro is teaching that when a paid guard pays for the item deposited into his watch he assumes ownership over the item and acquires all future 'income' that will come from that item.  This same idea is illustrated in both stories.  In the story of Betsy and in the story of the Pots and Pans.

So why does the Mishna tell us both stories? Is there anything we would not understand by telling us only one of the stories?

In order for the guard to assume 'ownership' over the item, it is necessary for the owner to relinquish his control over it.  To pass the 'torch' over to the possession of the guard.  The guard can not assume ownership unless the owner is ready to relinquish his ownership over the object.  Therefore we are in need  of both cases.  For had we only brought one of the cases we would have assumes that in the second case the owner would not be ready to relinquish his ownership over the item.

Stop! Think for a minute.  Which case would the owner be less agreeable to relinquish ownership? Which case would the owner be less ready to relinquish the possible future income?




Obviously, where the possible future income would be higher! Very good, I am sure you got it. (Anyone not smart enough to get that would have been too bored to get this far down the page, :-))

When the possible future income is low, the owner would rather be secure in his principal than take a gamble that maybe the thief will be found.  However when the future income is high, than we would have reason to believe that perhaps over there the owner will rather keep ownership over the item in the case the thief is caught and he will than incur profits of 400%. 

Had we only brought down the story of the pots and pans we would have thought, there the owner will gladly relinquish his ownership in exchange for the items value for he is only foregoing a possible doubling of his money -- if the thief is found.  So he says, better to be sure in my principal than hope that I will get double back.  However when the stakes are raised, with the ox, and it is possible that he may get 400% back, maybe than he wont forego and relinquish his ownership.  Therefore the Mishna has to bring down the case of the ox as well.  (I am not going to go into why we need the case of the pots and pans as it is irrelevent to my point).

Good old Betsy is worth more than a few pots and pans.  An ox probably costs somewhere close to a few thousand dollars (I am taking a shot in the dark I actually have no idea) and a plate wont get you anywhere near there.  So the gemoro could have just said that because oxen are worth a lot more so the owner wont want to forego the possible doubling of that significant amount in the case the robber is found out.  However the gemoro specifically said that a person might not want to forego the quadrupling or pentupling of the value of the product in the case the robber is caught.  The Gemoro focused on the percentage not the value.

What I learn from here is that it is important to deal with percentages, not with amounts.  When you are gaining or losing money dont focus on the amount, focus on the percentage.  When you are saving money or paying extra for something dont focus on the amount of money, focus on the percentage of money.

Two incidents to bring out the point. 
1) I was looking for a filing cabinet recently.  I found one on gumtree (Craigslist in SA version) and they were asking 400R, I asked them for 250R, they said yes right away, seeing that they were anxious to sell I said, "How about 150R?" So we settled for 200R.  I chopped off the price by 200R, not a large amount.  I chopped of the price by 50%, now that is huge!

2) I was making copies of a couple of keys.  The guy rings them up at the counter and says 30R.  I replied, "You dont happen to give discounts on key copies do you?" To which he replied, "I will give it to you for 27R." I saved 3R, thats nothing, 30 cents, or I saved 10% now that is huge.  If you could take all of your bills and slash them down by 10% you would be very happy. 

Focus on the percentages not the amounts.  The amounts will come later.

Thanks for reading until the end, I hope you enjoyed, and can you come up with a title for this article?

Comments [0]

Judge everyone favorably.

Our Sages command us to "Judge everyone favorably."

  This tenet is generally regarded as a moral obligation.  It is a principle that our sages laid down that we must abide to.  Looking past the surface and judging people favorably and with a positive eye is difficult.  When things appear to be one way - and we are always sure they are that way - to look past that is hard.  Nevertheless, our sages command us "Judge everyone favorably."  Difficult, but you must obey.  Demanding, but do as we say.  It is our moral obligation.

Perhaps another idea.

The way that we look at people effects the way that we act towards them. 

  Viewing people positively empowers you to be expressive towards them.  We are attracted to them.  The lines of communication are open.  Our positive view of them encourages connection and facilitates conversation. 

  However, when we view someone negatively we are no longer able to be expressive towards them.  We are repelled by them.  The lines of communication are closed.   Our negative view of them hinders and stifles connection.

  It is preferable to have open lines of communication.  When communication flows than even when something is amiss it is rectifiable.  When lines are closed than you never know what is happening behind the door.

   "Judge everyone favorably" is not merely a command but also a recommendation.  "Judge everyone favorably" is not only laying down a moral principle with which we are obliged to live by, but also giving guidance on how to live a happy life amongst the people around you.  If you want to be able to communicate easily with people around you than "Judge them favorably".

Comments [0]

Every man his hour.

Humans are interdependent beings.  We are dependent on each other for many things in life.  We depend on people adhering to traffic rules in order to get from one place to the next.  We depend on people to make sure there is food in the store.  We depend on people for so many things in life.  All you have to do is think through your day and you realize that you need people...hopefully people need you as well.

As we are interdependent, we must get along with people.  As the Mishna goes, "אין לך אדם שאין לו שעה".  There is no person in the world that doesnt have his hour.  Every person has his hour in which he can shine, in which he can give something to someone else.

People with wealth, physical or spiritual wealth, usually are on the giving end.  They tend to have connections, resources, and all sorts of other goodies.  However, there comes a time where they also fall short, for example when they are in a foreign place.  In a foreign city, they dont know anyone nor does anyone know them.  At that point maybe even the city pauper could help them out, even if it be for directions.  "There is no man that doesnt have his hour!" Remember that, and remember that well.

Comments [0]

Come up w/captions! awesome pics my wife took!

       
Click here to download:
Come_up_wcaptions_awesome_pics.zip (69 KB)

Comments [9]

JOKE: for Shel Israel.

A well dressed guy walked into a bank in New York and asked to speak to the loan manager.  The loan manager walks out and sees a well dressed man thinking he is in here for a big loan, probably some business venture of sorts. 

To his chagrin the guy asks him for a 500$ loan.  The bank manager looks into his account and his banking details (this was a long time ago, when dinosaurs roamed America, lol) and sees the man is loaded.  He is wondering to himself why the guy wants the loan but he refrains from nosing about.  (That sounds more like todays America.) The banker asks for a collateral.  The guy points his finger outside to a brand new Rolls Royce.  The banker says, "Well I guess that will do."  Now he is really wondering what this guy needs a measly 500$ loan for.

A few weeks later the guy walks back into the bank with a nice tan puts the 500$ on the counter and asks for his keys.  The manager unable to control his curiosity, asks him, "You are a wealthy man, why did you need a 500$ loan?!" To which he replied, "Where can you find parking in New York for a few weeks for 500$?

Got it?

Comments [1]

A little late but a GREAT Chanukah read.

This is an article written by Meir Kahane, although he is know for being a fanatic, I think this is a BRILLIANT article.

December 15, 1972 Rabbi Meir Kahane Writings (5732-33) (1971-73)

If I were a Reform rabbi; if I were a leader of the Establishment whose money and prestige have succeeded in capturing for him the leadership and voice of American Jewry; if I were one of the members of the Israeli Government's ruling group; if I were an enlightened sophisticated, modern Jewish intellectual, I would climb the barricades and join in battle against the most dangerous of all Jewish holidays – Chanukah.

It is a measure of the total ignorance of the world Jewish community that there is no holiday that is more universally celebrated than the "Feast of Lights", and it is an equal measure of the intellectual dishonesty and of Jewish leadership that it plays along with the lie. For if ever there was a holiday that stands for everything that the mass of world Jewry and their leadership has rejected – it is this one. If one would find an event that is truly rooted in everything that Jews of our times and their leaders have rejected and, indeed, attacked – it is this one. If there is any holiday that is more "unJewish" in the sense of our modern beliefs and practices – I do not know of it.

The Chanukah that has erupted unto the world Jewish scene in all its childishness, asininity, shallowness, ignorance and fraud – is not the Chanukah of reality. The Chanukah that came into vogue because of Jewish parents – in their vapidness – needed something to counteract Christmas; that exploded in a show of "we-can-have-lights-just-as-our-goyish-neighbors" and in an effort to reward our spoiled children with eight gifts instead of the poor Christian one; the Chanukah that the Temple, under its captive rabbi, turned into a school pageant so that the beaming parents might think that the Religious School is really successful instead of the tragic joke and waste that it really is; the Chanukah that speaks of Jewish Patrick Henrys giving-me-liberty-or death and the pictures of Maccabees as great liberal saviors who fought so that the kibbutzim might continue to be free to preach their Marx and eat their ham, that the split-level dwellers of suburbia might be allowed to violate their Sabbath in perfect freedom and the Reform and Conservative Temples continue the fight for civil rights for Blacks, Puerto Ricans and Jane Fonda, is not remotely connected with reality.

This is NOT the Chanukah of our ancestors, of the generations of Jews of Eastern Europe and Yemen and Morocco and the crusades and Spain and Babylon. It is surely not the Chanukah for which the Maccabees themselves died. Truly, could those whom we honor so munificently, return and see what Chanukah has become, they might very well begin a second Maccabean revolt. For the life that we Jews lead today was the very cause, the REAL reason for the revolt of the Jews "in those days in our times."

What happened in that era more than 2000 years ago? What led a handful of Jews to rise up in violence against the enemy? And precisely who WAS the enemy? What were they fighting FOR and who were they fighting AGAINST?

For years, the people of Judea had been the vassals of Greece. True independence as a state had been unknown for all those decades and, yet, the Jews did not rise up in revolt. It was only when the Greek policy shifted from mere political control to one that attempted to suppress the Jewish religion that the revolt erupted in all its bloodiness. It was not mere liberty that led to the Maccabean uprising that we so passionately applaud. What we are really cheering is a brave group of Jews who fought and plunged Judea into a bloodbath for the right to observe the Sabbath, to follow the laws of kashruth, to obey the laws of the Torah. IN A WORD EVERYTHING ABOUT CHANUKAH THAT WE COMMEMORATE AND TEACH OUR CHILDREN TO COMMEMORATE ARE THINGS WE CONSIDER TO BE OUTMODED, MEDIEVAL AND CHILDISH!

At best, then, those who fought and died for Chanukah were naïve and obscurantist. Had we lived in those days we would certainly not have done what they did for everyone knows that the laws of the Torah are not really Divine but only the products of evolution and men (do not the Reform, Reconstructionist and large parts of the Conservative movements write this daily?) Surely we would not have fought for that which we violate every day of our lives! No, at best Chanukah emerges as a needless holiday if not a foolish one. Poor Hannah and her seven children; poor Mattathias and Judah; poor well meaning chaps all but hopelessly backward and utterly unnecessary sacrifices.

But there is more. Not only is Chanukah really a foolish and unnecessary holiday, it is also one that is dangerously fanatical and illiberal. The first act of rebellion, the first enemy who fell at the hands of the brave Jewish heroes whom our delightful children portray so cleverly in their Sunday and religious school pageants, was NOT a Greek. He was a Jew.

When the enemy sent its troops into the town of Modin to set up an idol and demand its worship, it was a Jew who decided to exercise his freedom of pagan worship and who approached the altar to worship Zeus (after all, what business was it of anyone what this fellow worshipped?) And it was this Jew, this apostate, this religious traitor who was struck down by the brave, glorious, courageous (are these not the words all our Sunday schools use to describe him?) Mattathias, as he shouted: "Whoever is for G-d, follow me!"

What have we here? What kind of religious intolerance and bigotry? What kind of a man is this for the anti-religious of Hashomer Hatzair, the graceful temples of suburbia, the sophisticated intellectuals, the liberal open-minded Jews and all the drones who have wearied us unto death with the concept of Judaism as a humanistic, open-minded, undogmatic, liberal, universalistic (if not Marxist) religion, to honor? What kind of nationalism is this for David-Ben-Gurion (he who rejects the Galut and speaks of the proud, free Jew of ancient Judea and Israel)?

And to crush us even more (we who know that Judaism is a faith of peace which deplores violence), what kind of Jews were these who reacted to oppression with FORCE? Surely we who so properly have deplored Jewish violence as fascistic, immoral and (above all!) UN-JEWISH, stand in horror as we contemplate Jews who declined to picket the Syrian Greeks to death and who rejected quiet diplomacy for the sword, spear and arrow (had there been bombs in those days, who can tell what they might have done?) and "descended to the level of evil," thus rejecting the ethical and moral concepts of Judaism.

Is this the kind of a holiday we wish to propagate? Are these the kinds of men we want our moral and humanistic children to honor? Is this the kind of Judaism that we wish to observe and pass on to our children?

Where shall we find the man of courage the one voice, in the wilderness to cry out against Chanukah and the Judaism that it represents-the Judaism of our grandparents and ancestors? Where shall we find the man of honesty and integrity to attack the Judaism of Medievalism and outdated foolishness; the Judaism of bigotry that strikes down Jews who refuse to observe the law; the Judaism of violence that calls for Jewish force and might against the enemy? When shall we find the courage to proudly eat our Chinese food and violate our Sabbaths and reject all the separateness, nationalism and religious maximalism that Chanukah so ignobly represents? …Down with Chanukah! It is a regressive holiday that merely symbolizes the Judaism that always was; the Judaism that was handed down to us from Sinai; the Judaism that made our ancestors ready to give their lives for the L-rd; the Judaism that young people instinctively know is true and great and real. Such Judaism is dangerous for us and our leaders. We must do all in our power to bury it.

What are your thoughts?

Out of blog etiquette I am linking to the blog where I found it.
http://is.gd/eTyJ

Comments [0]

Hot/Cold. You decide.

Today I learned how taste is transferred and I thought of an interesting application to social interaction.  I would like to hear your thoughts on the matter.

In Jewish law ...
    Taste is transferred through heat.  Two foods will exchange tastes when put under the right temperature.  A cold piece of chicken sitting in cold water will not transfer its taste into the water. (Unless it remains there for a long time, which is another point not for now)  In order for the water to acquire the taste of the chicken you need to turn on the stove and apply heat.  Once the mixture is hot enough they will exchange tastes. 

In physics ...
    When heat is applied to an object it causes the molecules to separate, and if enough heat is applied the object will turn into a gas.  Think water into a vapor.  When cold is applied to an object the molecules get tighter and the object is made more solid.  Think water into ice. 

The rule:
    Heat spreads things out.  Heat transfers tastes.  Heat spreads out molecules.  Cold brings things tighter.  Cold doesn't allow transfer of taste.  Cold tightens molecules.

In communities ...
    Hot places will breed social circles where people are spread out.  Social circles where people are in general very amiable and friendly.  However, people in hot places don't develop CLOSE relationships. Cold places will breed social circles where people are more insular, keep to themselves.  Social circles where people are curt and bordering on rude.  However, the people within their social circles will be very tight, they will have close and meaningful relationships.

Comments [0]

My latest productivity findings. RTM Kicks!

Recently I was looking for a new way of keeping track of all of my to-dos.  Until now I was using something called a pocket mod which was very useful, but I figured I would try going high-tech so I wouldn't have to rewrite all of my to-dos every week.

One of the beauties of a pocket mod are that it has one of the most important things which you need in a personal organization tool, namely accessibility.  It is absolutely critical that you can access your personal organizer -- anywhere and everywhere.  You need to be able to input item and export items as quickly as possible.  That is why the pocket mod was so good.

So I recently came across a personal productivity tool called "Remember The Milk".  It also has the accessibility trait, so long as you have Internet on your mobile.  It gives you so many ways that you can input tasks and export tasks that accessibility is never far away.

Here are all of the addons I am using, I hope you find this helpful.  Shout out in the comments for anything that was useful or for any things which I may have missed.


www.rememberthemilk.com -- you have to create an account, its pretty self explanatory.
http://is.gd/b0RC --  A must have for gmail users
http://is.gd/p9w -- A fantastic post as per how to set up your Remember the Milk with GTD
http://is.gd/10e -- Greasemonkey which enables you to change the setup of RTM with addons
http://is.gd/c9pF -- A greasemonkey userscript which I find useful
http://is.gd/eRGM -- Instructions on how to send a task through email, very useful as I am always at email

If you want to see what a pocketmod is: www.pocketmod.com

Comments [0]

Status Quo

People don't like changing the status quo.  There is something about the status quo that makes people feel comfortable.  They may not be in a great situation but at least they know what it is.

The status quo is a very dangerous place to be.  You can get locked into things which aren't good.  It is a pair of brakes on change, movement, and growth.

I have been putting off changing my cell plan for a couple of weeks now just because it is at a status quo and I am being lazy to change it.

Challenge your status quo.  Challenge your companies status quo.  Challenge the worlds status quo.
Filed under  //   life  

Comments [0]

Filed under  //   "financial bubble"  

Comments [0]

About

Rabbi. Tech enthusiast.

This blog contains thoughts and ideas which have enhanced my life and I hope will enhance yours!
1. Inspirational thoughts.
2. Personal productivity hacks.
3. Product and Book reviews.

I will be posting twice a week. Mondays and Thursdays.

Feel free to subscribe to my biweekly posts. Just click below on the subscribe button. I look forward to meeting you!